Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 1:27:47 GMT -5
of notices, promotion of bids for the concession of exploration, execution of contracts, authorization for refining and stipulation of tariffs, among others, represents the very standardization of activities related to oil, and this agency can decide , according to its exclusive will – not affected even by the National Energy Policy Council, which has a merely propositional function – “ which section of the national territory will be bid for; what is the extension; How many; what are the conditions for qualification; how much; When is the deadline; what are the requirements for protecting the national economy”.
Regarding art. 19, which determines the promotion of public hearings, called and directed by the ANP, at a time prior to the forwarding of bills or changes to administrative rules that affect the rights of economic agents, consumers and users of goods and services from the oil industry, the author maintains that there is a violation of the principle of separation of Powers, since the aforementioned agency ceases to be an advisory body and takes precedence, in legislative activity,Phone Number List “ not only over the National Congress, but also over the Head of the Executive Branch himself ”. Also, due to an undue legislative delegation, art.
the Diploma under analysis, which gives the ANP the prerogative to establish the technical, economic and legal requirements necessary to obtain the concession for the exploration and production of oil and natural gas, in a “typical role of legislator delegated to the ANP by the law in question ” . As for article 22, it asserts that the transfer to the ANP of Petrobrás' technical studies on Brazilian sedimentary basins constitutes true expropriation “in absolute disregard for the right to property, the need for fair and prior compensation in money ”. Finally, with regard to art. 25 of the Law now contested, states that the possibility o.
Regarding art. 19, which determines the promotion of public hearings, called and directed by the ANP, at a time prior to the forwarding of bills or changes to administrative rules that affect the rights of economic agents, consumers and users of goods and services from the oil industry, the author maintains that there is a violation of the principle of separation of Powers, since the aforementioned agency ceases to be an advisory body and takes precedence, in legislative activity,Phone Number List “ not only over the National Congress, but also over the Head of the Executive Branch himself ”. Also, due to an undue legislative delegation, art.
the Diploma under analysis, which gives the ANP the prerogative to establish the technical, economic and legal requirements necessary to obtain the concession for the exploration and production of oil and natural gas, in a “typical role of legislator delegated to the ANP by the law in question ” . As for article 22, it asserts that the transfer to the ANP of Petrobrás' technical studies on Brazilian sedimentary basins constitutes true expropriation “in absolute disregard for the right to property, the need for fair and prior compensation in money ”. Finally, with regard to art. 25 of the Law now contested, states that the possibility o.